This article offers a critical examination of the concept of relational autonomy. After reconstructing its meaning and main premises – set in contrast to the dominant individualistic approach in ethical and political philosophy – the paper assesses whether this perspective succeeds in overcoming cognitive ableism. The effectiveness of the relational approach is analyzed within models of decision-making support and fiduciary care, highlighting, however, the persistence of ableist assumptions. It is argued that, despite its promise of greater inclusivity, relational autonomy continues to uphold autonomy—albeit redefined—as a central value. This reveals the need for a more radical questioning of its primacy in order to enable the genuine philosophical inclusion of disabled lives.
Disabilità e autonomia: i limiti dell'approccio relazionale
Melidoro, Domenico
2025-01-01
Abstract
This article offers a critical examination of the concept of relational autonomy. After reconstructing its meaning and main premises – set in contrast to the dominant individualistic approach in ethical and political philosophy – the paper assesses whether this perspective succeeds in overcoming cognitive ableism. The effectiveness of the relational approach is analyzed within models of decision-making support and fiduciary care, highlighting, however, the persistence of ableist assumptions. It is argued that, despite its promise of greater inclusivity, relational autonomy continues to uphold autonomy—albeit redefined—as a central value. This reveals the need for a more radical questioning of its primacy in order to enable the genuine philosophical inclusion of disabled lives.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

