This article offers a critical examination of the concept of relational autonomy. After reconstructing its meaning and main premises – set in contrast to the dominant individualistic approach in ethical and political philosophy – the paper assesses whether this perspective succeeds in overcoming cognitive ableism. The effectiveness of the relational approach is analyzed within models of decision-making support and fiduciary care, highlighting, however, the persistence of ableist assumptions. It is argued that, despite its promise of greater inclusivity, relational autonomy continues to uphold autonomy—albeit redefined—as a central value. This reveals the need for a more radical questioning of its primacy in order to enable the genuine philosophical inclusion of disabled lives.

Disabilità e autonomia: i limiti dell'approccio relazionale

Melidoro, Domenico
2025-01-01

Abstract

This article offers a critical examination of the concept of relational autonomy. After reconstructing its meaning and main premises – set in contrast to the dominant individualistic approach in ethical and political philosophy – the paper assesses whether this perspective succeeds in overcoming cognitive ableism. The effectiveness of the relational approach is analyzed within models of decision-making support and fiduciary care, highlighting, however, the persistence of ableist assumptions. It is argued that, despite its promise of greater inclusivity, relational autonomy continues to uphold autonomy—albeit redefined—as a central value. This reveals the need for a more radical questioning of its primacy in order to enable the genuine philosophical inclusion of disabled lives.
2025
ableism
cognitive ableism
disability
inclusion
inclusive design
relational autonomy
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12606/46725
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
social impact